Let
Ej and
Fj each be a
D11: Set for every
j∈J such that
If the intersection
⋂j∈JEj is empty, the claim follows from
R7: Empty set is subset of every set. Suppose thus that
⋂j∈JEj is not empty and fix
x∈⋂j∈JEj. By definition of set intersection, now
x belongs to
Ej for every
j∈J. Combining this with the initial assumptions, one then has
x∈Ej⊆Fj
and thus
x∈Fj for every
j∈J. Therefore, again by the definition of a set intersection,
x∈⋂j∈JFj. Since
x∈⋂j∈JEj was arbitrary, we have the inclusion
⋂j∈JEj⊆⋂j∈JFj.
◻