Let
ω∈Ω be an outcome such that
∑Nn=1Xn(ω)≠∑Nn=1Yn(ω). Then
Xn(ω)≠Yn(ω) for at least one
n∈1,…,N, for otherwise the sums
∑Nn=1Xn(ω) and
∑Nn=1Yn(ω) would be equal. Thus, by definition of a union,
ω∈⋃Nn=1{Xn≠Yn}. Since
ω∈Ω was arbitrary, we have the inclusion
{N∑n=1Xn≠N∑n=1Yn}⊆N⋃n=1{Xn≠Yn}
Result
R2090: Isotonicity of probability measure now implies
P(N∑n=1Xn≠N∑n=1Yn)≤P(N⋃n=1{Xn≠Yn})
which is what was required to be shown.
◻